<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The American Liberalism Project - Recent Comments</title>
    <link>http://americanliberalism.org</link>
    <description>The American Liberalism Project</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:09:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Gary Leupp Responds</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=316</link>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/14561" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt;"All Our Efforts Will Not Stop the Attack on Iran"&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:20:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JB</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=316</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shame on the Clintons, Particularly Hillary</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=315</link>
      <description>Bob Herbert in the &lt;i&gt;NYT&lt;/i&gt; has &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/opinion/10herbert.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt;much the same&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to say about the Clinton campaign. Their "Southern strategy" is appalling and completely outside the traditions, principles, and morals of the Democratic Party. Her Shermanesque march on Denver will open wounds that will take a generation to heal.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;JB</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JB</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=315</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yeah, yeah ...</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=314</link>
      <description>This writer has flogged the idea of an Article V Consitutional convention from just about every perspective. It is not going to happen in a Congress that is afraid to impeach war criminals and liars.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;JB</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JB</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=314</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good Grief!</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=313</link>
      <description>This could have been a good solid report, but the puerile writing and fatheadedness of the author just about ruined for me. So much rhetorical masturbation, and so little content.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Hagee is a menace. &amp;nbsp;There is no doubt about that. He cannot disappear into the rathole from whence he came soon enough to suit me. &#xD;&lt;p&gt;JB &amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JB</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=313</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WWIII</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=312</link>
      <description>Charles Peters, in The Charleston Gazette, questions if attending church where the pastor was obsessive with the Chinese Nationalists constitues his being in favor of WWIII...&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;May 4, 2008&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Charles Peters&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;A pastor problem of my own&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;When I last attended church regularly, my pastor, like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was a good man in many ways but had a few truly bizarre ideas. For one thing, he was obsessed with the cause of the Chinese Nationalists who had retreated to Taiwan after being defeated by the Communists. &#xD;&lt;br /&gt;When I last attended church regularly, my pastor, like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was a good man in many ways but had a few truly bizarre ideas. For one thing, he was obsessed with the cause of the Chinese Nationalists who had retreated to Taiwan after being defeated by the Communists. He even seemed willing to risk World War III by having the U.S. help the Nationalists retake China. During such sermons, I usually tuned him out and used the time for the kind of contemplation and reflection not possible during a busy workweek - with, I must admit, a passing thought or two about sex or my favorite sports. If I had run for president, would I have been accused of advocating World War III because I had gone to that church? &#xD;&lt;p&gt;When twice as much Wright makes a wrong&#xD;&lt;p&gt;The media may have rightfully decided they were tilting toward Obama before "Saturday Night Live" ridiculed them for doing so, but since then they have been tilting very much against him. I had hoped that the speech he gave in Philadelphia would put an end to the firestorm of race stories that had lately dominated the news, beginning with Geraldine Ferraro's comments and exploding with around-the-clock cable replays of some of Wright's less judicious pronouncements. But on the Sunday after the Philadelphia speech, as I scanned the contents of The Washington Post, I found that there was not one but, count 'em, eight articles on race in the campaign - including one by the paper's ombudsman regretting the fact that the Post had not gotten on the Wright story earlier. The first and last page of the Post's Outlook section featured large photos of Wright.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;What has been most disturbing to me about most of the Wright coverage is that it implies that Obama must share some of the cleric's more outrageous views. Yet there is absolutely no evidence that Obama does in fact agree with any of them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>SueZ</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=312</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reverend Wright.....</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=311</link>
      <description>I listened intently to Wright's National Press Club address and was impressed.&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;He is a man committed to doing God's work within a mixed society, but from a minority stance... and the majority don't like the truth he speaks.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;As an Australian, a white Australian, I was talking with a person yesterday about theis and the nacent racism here... the friend I was talking to is aboriginal, for him, the racism is not nascent, it is a real, every day occurence, just that us white folks don't see it that way.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;Wright's words resonate for any-one who is in a cultural minority.&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Bert.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>GCHet</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=311</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Speech</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=310</link>
      <description>The Chicago Trib. has the transcript of Obama's speech&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-04292008-obamaonwright,0,3858904.story"="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt; here &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:25:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>SueZ</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=310</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Childhood Hunger</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=309</link>
      <description>I find it a but ironic that to discuss the issue of hunger one has a &lt;a href="http://kennebecjournal.mainetoday.com/news/local/5003475.html"="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt; dinner &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; over which to discuss it. But what else would one do?&#xD;&lt;br /&gt;Childhood hunger is devastating and leads to so many other societal ills down the road.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>SueZ</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=309</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Betray Us</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=308</link>
      <description>And they said that the MoveOn.org advert was wrong? &amp;nbsp;General Betray Us seems apropos to me!!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>SueZ</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=308</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Petraeus and Odierno Promoted</title>
      <link>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=307</link>
      <description>From the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/24/AR2008042403315.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;editors of the Washington Post&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, more from the war party. The &lt;i&gt;Post&lt;/i&gt; may believe it is being responsible, but the only way to know is to strip the wallpaper from this room and start again.&#xD;&lt;p&gt;JB</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:34:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>JB</author>
      <guid>http://americanliberalism.org/showComment.do?commentId=307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

