The American Liberalism Project - Recent Comments

homebrewing beer

roymutia — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:13:43 GMT

Thanks for the information...I am looking forward for more postings...Keep up the good work!

-http://www.thebarrelsource.com

Digging In

SueZ — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:48:16 GMT

I understand your desire to find a safe haven but I think more to the point, than the fact that we despoil just about everything we come in contact with...I am fresh off of watching the Ken Burns series on our national parks...we never know what the long term ramifications of our intrusion are or will be. Or, take into consideration before it is too late those effects. How can we be sure that our drilling...burrowing if you will...into the moon's core will not make that orb implode?
I guess neither of us will be around to know.

Surface of the Moon

James R. Brett — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:25:46 GMT

Your point, SueZ, is that we spoil everything we touch. I cannot circumscribe my curiosity and our species' need to get off this still beautiful planet because of that slogan.

But, more to the point, we have to burrow into the moon to be safe. Radiation and micro-meteorites would turn us to mincemeat in no time on the surface.

Water, where it exists, will be under the surface as well. So, it just makes sense.

Luna could be a thriving place in a couple hundred years ... sort of a Las Vegas, improbable, in a hostile environment, but full of energy and probably enterprise.

If something goes wrong on Earth ... something epic, like a large meteor hit ... or like Yellowstone going off and creating a new ice age ... or Iran going off and precipitating a nuclear exchange between NATO and China, say, then we really need a few eggs out of this basket.

Ramifications

SueZ — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:43:39 GMT

Playing devil's advocate here...what would be the ramifications of a permanent colony on the moon? What would we be doing to the surface of that body? Look at what we have done to our earth?

Depression

SueZ — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:45:32 GMT

I agree. And that is why I believe I mentioned that there are those who do have severe and very real depression. But I would hazard a guess that most who take anti depressants would benefit more from perhaps some sort of therapy. (remember the placebo group!) I also wholeheartedly agree about the insurance debate. I have yet to see anything that resembles actual reform. Let's hope we get something...and soon!

Feeling Down? Here, Have A Tic Tac

Ragingrhino — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:15:47 GMT

While much of the advertisements of Big Pharma are self-serving hype and deception, there are people who are suffering from severe and debilitating illnesses such as depression. When prescribed by a trained physician,monitored regularly, and supplemented with counseling or group support, drug therapy is frequently successful. Of course, that requires money and the insurance companies cannot be relied to provide consistent financing over time. That is another reason for some form of a single payer system.

Republicans

SueZ — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:54:49 GMT

The display or lack thereof from the Republicns last night during Obama's speech was the most disgusting thing I have ever witnessed. They certainly are now totally the Nihilist Party. I wonder if they will rise to the bait that Obama threw out on his hook!!

Translation

SueZ — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:05:46 GMT

To be guaranteed, the sufficient richness to nourish itself WITH DIGNITY must be organized by l' State which only can apply an economic management and not only financial.
The ONLY economic means is d' to adopt the economic coherence of the originator in Economy which is the Maillard French. The name of sound " évolution" capitalism is: l' Active Inoppression.
The mechanics of l' Inoppression Active is explained on site HTTP; /www.critiqueduliberalisme.com
Without this mechanics, ANYTHING n' is possible to guarantee health